Re: [wsbpel] agenda for Dec 21

[Alexandre Alves <aalves@bea.com>]

Title: Re: [wsbpel] agenda for Dec 21

Vinky,

Thanks, I will call back at 9:00 PST then.

Rgds


On 12/21/05 2:18 PM, "Mehta, Vinkesh (US - Austin)" <vmehta@DELOITTE.com> wrote:

Diane had said yesteday on the editors call yesterday that she will be an hour late. So I think John is supposed to start the call.

---

From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
Sent: Wed 12/21/2005 10:16 AM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] agenda for Dec 21

8:15 pst and still no con call leader;-)

 
-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Jordan  [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:14  AM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel]  agenda for Dec 21


The  next call of the WS BPEL TC will be on Wed. Dec. 21 at 8 am Pacific.   Dial in info is: USA & Canada Toll Free Number: +1 866 500 6738,  Pass code: 600345, All Others (toll): +1 203 480 8000, Pass code: 600345.   We will use an irc chat at:     http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/wsbpel   

NOTE:  TC Conference calls for Dec. 28 and Jan  4 have been cancelled.  After Dec. 21, our next meeting will be the face  to face in Raleigh, NC on Jan 10-12.  If you will not be attending the  f2f either in person or by phone, please consider requesting a leave of  absence.  

Summary of Dec  14 call:
Update on primer plan - work  is progressing.  Call planned for Dec. 16.
123: proposal from Dec 14 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00074.html <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00074.html> ) passed with two amendments:
1.  remove the following from 123:  Further  if an open IMA goes out of scope prior to being closed by a reply activity  then the scope MUST throw a bpws:missingReply fault.  In other words a  scope which declares a partnerLink or messageExchange used by an IMA will not  complete normally if that IMA is open when the scope is to complete.  
2.  replace:
Default message exchange instances, just like  non-default messages exchanges, are created each time the default message  exchange provider is executed.  For example each time an onEvent is  executed (i.e. when a new message arrives for processing) it creates a new  default message exchange instance associated with each onEvent instance.  
with:   
Default message exchange instances, just like  non-default messages exchanges, are made available each time the default  message exchange provider is executed.  For example each time an onEvent  is executed (i.e. when a new message arrives for processing) it makes  available a new default message exchange instance associated with each onEvent  instance.
229: proposal just available  this morning.  It will be discussed by email for possible vote at next  meeting.   
110: proposal from Dec  9 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00058.htm <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00058.html> l) passed
82.1:   discussion continuing
88: no  action required.  This was just a clarification of the schema, not a new  proposal.   
236: proposal from  Dec. 7 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00047.html <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00047.html> ) passed.   
237: proposal from Dec. 7 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00044.html <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00044.html>  ) passed.
239:   motion made and seconded (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00046.html <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00046.html>  ).  Further discussion deferred to next  meeting.
240:  issue opened.    

Proposed agenda for next  meeting:   
- Nomination/volunteers to take minutes for this call    
- Roll call/determine quorum
- Review/accept minutes from   previous meeting(s) - Dec. 7, 14
- Review agenda
- Subgroup  reports as available
- Specification Editing status
- Issue discussion.  Note we will follow the  agreed to process of limiting discussions of any issue on calls to no more  than 30 minutes at the end of which the person who made the motion can choose  to table to next meeting or force a vote (without requiring 2/3 majority to  stop discussion).   Those who want to continue to discuss need to go off  line to work the issue.  At next meeting progress should be reported – or  issue will go to vote with original proposal.  If issue goes to a vote  process starts again as above.  If results of offline discussions result  in amended proposal to vote, the new proposal should be provided to the TC in  advance of voting meeting.
Proposals  to vote
229
82.1
239  
  
Agenda for next meeting:
Proposed agenda items for face to face on Jan  10-12:
- review all open issues and  work on proposals to close
- primer  status
- other agenda topics?    
  
New business
  
Regards,
John  Evdemon and Diane Jordan
WS-BPEL TC Co-chairs

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.

Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]