[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 229 - Proposal for vote
Hi, This is a minor observation, but I don't find it that confusing to differentiate between <compensate/> and <compensate scope="X"/>. I actually think it makes sense to have the same Xml element relate to both forms of compensation, as, after-all, both do deal with compensation of their inner scopes, the latter selectively. Compensation is a tricky feature to explain nonetheless, it seems to me that having a more descriptive name won't help that much, hence I am in favor of keeping the simplicity of the single compensate name. For example, we don't have a <receiveInOnly/>, <receiveInOut/> instead of just <receive/>. Also <compensateInner/> seems to indicate that there is a <compensateOuter/>. Anyway, just my opinion, either way we go is fine with me. Sincerely,
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]