RE: [wsbpel] Issue 82.1 - Proposal for vote

["Charlton Barreto" <cbarreto@adobe.com>]

Attached is a zip archive (change the extension to .zip to expand) of the
spec text, based on a clean snapshot of the latest draft, containing my
approved resolution for Issue 82.1 with Rania's amendment(s).   

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

-Charlton. 
--
Adobe Systems Incorporated
+1 (408) 536-4496 p
cbarreto@adobe.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Rania Khalaf [mailto:rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2006 08:17
To: Charlton Barreto
Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 82.1 - Proposal for vote

Hi guys,

Here are the proposed consistency changes for 82.1 that I promised to 
send out during yesterday's call.

CHANGES PROPOSED :
__________________

CHANGE 1
---------
Modify the definition of executable completion add a new first bullet :

*)is derived by:
     *)changing the namespace to that of executable BPEL and removing the
profile URI
     *)and using some combination of the following transformation ...
        a)Opaque Token Replacement ...
        b)Addition of BPEL Constructs: Adding new ...
*is a valid ...

CHANGE 2
---------

from:
----
There is no fundamental expressive power distinction between abstract
and executable processes. Abstract process constructs are based on those
of executable processes, while allow opacity and omission. To
accommodate this flexibility, the XML Schema for the Common Base of
Abstract Process does not reuse any definitions from XML Schema for the
Executable Process. The two have distinct namespaces: one for abstract
and one for executable.

to:
-----
There is no fundamental expressive power distinction between abstract
and executable processes. To accommodate the syntactic flexibility
introduced by allowing opacity and omission in the syntax of abstract
processes, the XML Schema for the Common Base of Abstract Processes does
not reuse any definitions from XML Schema for the Executable Processes.
The two have distinct namespaces: one for abstract BPEL processes and
one for executable BPEL processes.

Regards,
Rania


Charlton Barreto wrote:
> Attached is a zip archive (change the extension to .zip to expand) of 
> the spec text, based on a clean snapshot of the latest draft, capturing 
> my proposed resolution for Issue 82.1. This is identical to the copy I 
> sent last week reflecting our discussions at the 2006-Feb-08 conference 
> call.
> 
>  
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> 
>  
> 
> Best,
> 
>  
> 
> -Charlton.
> 
>  
> 
> --
> 
> 	
> 
> *Charlton Barreto*
> Sr .Computer Scientist
> Adobe Systems Incorporated
> 345 Park Avenue, MS E15
> San Jose, CA 95110-2704 USA
> 408.536.4496 p  
> 415.692.5396 v
> cbarreto@adobe.com
> 
>  
>

wsbpel-specification-draft.issue82.1.zzz

smime.p7s