Re: [wsbpel] Issue 120 - Clarification on Resolution

[Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>]

Since that statement is not exactly normative ... how about adding "for 
example,"

every messaging activity (for example, receive, reply, and invoke)

Then, we do not need to repeat every single message construct.

Thanks!


Regards,
Alex Yiu


Dieter Koenig1 wrote:

>Just a minor: "every messaging activity (receive, reply, and invoke)" would
>also need to include pick/onMessage and eventHandlers/onEvent.
>Kind Regards
>DK
>
>
>
>                                                                           
>             "Alexandre Alves"                                             
>             <aalves@bea.com>                                              
>                                                                        To 
>             16.02.2006 01:45          <alex.yiu@oracle.com>, "Danny van   
>                                       der Rijn" <dannyv@tibco.com>,       
>                                       "Charlton Barreto"                  
>                                       <cbarreto@adobe.com>,               
>                                       <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>       
>                                                                        cc 
>                                                                           
>                                                                   Subject 
>                                       RE: [wsbpel] Issue 120 -            
>                                       Clarification on Resolution         
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>After further off-line discussions, the new suggested spec text is:
>
>In Section 9.2:
>
>- from:
>
>The examples in this section show correlation being used on almost every
>messaging activity (receive, reply, and invoke). This is because WS-BPEL
>does not assume the use of any sophisticated conversational transport
>protocols for messaging. In cases where such protocols are used, the
>explicit use of correlation in WS-BPEL can be reduced to those activities
>that establish the conversational connections
>
>- to:
>
>The examples in this section show correlation being used on almost every
>messaging activity (receive, reply, and invoke). This is because the
>WS-BPEL specification does not assume the use of any sophisticated
>conversational transport protocols for messaging. In cases where such
>protocols are used, the explicit use of correlation in WS-BPEL can be
>reduced to those activities that establish the conversational connections.
>These protocol mechanisms MAY be used implicitly with or without any
>explicit use of correlation.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>From: Alexandre Alves
>Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:59 AM
>To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; Danny van der Rijn
>Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 120 - Clarification on Resolution
>
>In Section 9.2:
>
>- from:
>
>The examples in this section show correlation being used on almost every
>messaging activity (receive, reply, and invoke). This is because WS-BPEL
>does not assume the use of any sophisticated conversational transport
>protocols for messaging. In cases where such protocols are used, the
>explicit use of correlation in WS-BPEL can be reduced to those activities
>that establish the conversational connections
>
>- to:
>
>
>The examples in this section show correlation being used on almost every
>messaging activity (receive, reply, and invoke). This is because WS-BPEL
>does not assume the use of any sophisticated conversational transport
>protocols for messaging. In cases where such protocols are used, an
>implicit implementation-specific correlation mechanism MAY be used.
>
>
>  
>