OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 82.1 - Updated !


Ah, I see it now. I'll correct it and repost the doc....

-----Original Message-----
From: Rania Khalaf [mailto:rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 16 February, 2006 13:25
To: Charlton Barreto
Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 82.1 - Updated !


Oh John, you are right it is still there.

Charlton, the second change did not make it into the document.
I have updated it in the attached doc. Everything else is the same :



thanks!
Rania

Charlton Barreto wrote:
> Attached is a zip archive (change the extension to .zip to expand) of the
> spec text, based on a clean snapshot of the latest draft, containing my
> approved resolution for Issue 82.1 with Rania's amendment(s).   
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions. 
> 
> -Charlton. 
> --
> Adobe Systems Incorporated
> +1 (408) 536-4496 p
> cbarreto@adobe.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rania Khalaf [mailto:rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2006 08:17
> To: Charlton Barreto
> Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 82.1 - Proposal for vote
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> Here are the proposed consistency changes for 82.1 that I promised to 
> send out during yesterday's call.
> 
> CHANGES PROPOSED :
> __________________
> 
> CHANGE 1
> ---------
> Modify the definition of executable completion add a new first bullet :
> 
> *)is derived by:
>      *)changing the namespace to that of executable BPEL and removing the
> profile URI
>      *)and using some combination of the following transformation ...
>         a)Opaque Token Replacement ...
>         b)Addition of BPEL Constructs: Adding new ...
> *is a valid ...
> 
> CHANGE 2
> ---------
> 
> from:
> ----
> There is no fundamental expressive power distinction between abstract
> and executable processes. Abstract process constructs are based on those
> of executable processes, while allow opacity and omission. To
> accommodate this flexibility, the XML Schema for the Common Base of
> Abstract Process does not reuse any definitions from XML Schema for the
> Executable Process. The two have distinct namespaces: one for abstract
> and one for executable.
> 
> to:
> -----
> There is no fundamental expressive power distinction between abstract
> and executable processes. To accommodate the syntactic flexibility
> introduced by allowing opacity and omission in the syntax of abstract
> processes, the XML Schema for the Common Base of Abstract Processes does
> not reuse any definitions from XML Schema for the Executable Processes.
> The two have distinct namespaces: one for abstract BPEL processes and
> one for executable BPEL processes.
> 
> Regards,
> Rania
> 
> 
> Charlton Barreto wrote:
> 
>>Attached is a zip archive (change the extension to .zip to expand) of 
>>the spec text, based on a clean snapshot of the latest draft, capturing 
>>my proposed resolution for Issue 82.1. This is identical to the copy I 
>>sent last week reflecting our discussions at the 2006-Feb-08 conference 
>>call.
>>
>> 
>>
>>Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> 
>>
>>Best,
>>
>> 
>>
>>-Charlton.
>>
>> 
>>
>>--
>>
>>	
>>
>>*Charlton Barreto*
>>Sr .Computer Scientist
>>Adobe Systems Incorporated
>>345 Park Avenue, MS E15
>>San Jose, CA 95110-2704 USA
>>408.536.4496 p  
>>415.692.5396 v
>>cbarreto@adobe.com
>>
>> 
>>

smime.p7s



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]