Re: [wsbpel] Issue 243 - general idea

[Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>]

Serial forEach has implicit declaration (for index variable) as well.
In order for compensation to work (scope snapshot), the scope of that 
implicit declared index variable needs to be well-defined. Removing the 
scope would open another can of worms/discussion.

At this stage of the specification, generally speaking, I am against 
changing the semantics of serial / parallel forEach signifcantly, unless 
there is a bug.

Thanks!

Regards,
Alex Yiu


Danny van der Rijn wrote:

> I didn't actually put 243 into the draft of 242 as I said I might.  
> 243 would look very similar - split forEach into serialForEach and 
> parallelForEach, and moving the required scope-child of 
> parallelForEach into the parent element.  remove the requirement for 
> serialForEach to have a scope child.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php