Re: [wsbpel] wsbpel 3/30/2006: Inconsistency on <completionCondition>

[Monica J Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> During the F2F we changed Section 5.2 to read (MAY=>may): "A 
> <completionCondition> may be used within the <forEach> to allow the 
> <forEach> activity to complete without executing or finishing all the 
> branches specified."
>
> This is then currently inconsistent with similar text in Section 
> 11.7:  "When the optional <completionCondition> is specified within 
> the <forEach> construct, the forEach activity MAY be completed without 
> executing or finishing all the branches specified."
>
> To be consistent with the F2F actions, I suggest we revise Section 
> 11.7 accordingly. If true, I can open an action item.  I'd look to the 
> creators of the resolution to #6.2 on  this to determine if is 
> editorial or is inconsistent with the issue and proposal accepted. 

Correction Section 11.7. Thanks.