Re: [wsbpel] wsbpel 3/30/2006: Inconsistency on <completionCondition>

[Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>]

aren't those MAY's modifying different things?

Monica J Martin wrote:

During the F2F we changed Section 5.2 to read (MAY=>may): "A <completionCondition> may be used within the <forEach> to allow the <forEach> activity to complete without executing or finishing all the branches specified."

"An author may choose to use <completionCondition>"

This is then currently inconsistent with similar text in Section 12.7:  "When the optional <completionCondition> is specified within the <forEach> construct, the forEach activity MAY be completed without executing or finishing all the branches specified."

"If an author so chooses, an engine may choose to complete the activity"

To be consistent with the F2F actions, I suggest we revise Section 12.7 accordingly. If true, I can open an action item.  I'd look to the creators of the resolution to #6.2 on  this is editorial or is inconsistent with the  issue  and proposal.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php