[Fwd: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 250 - Proposal for Vote]

[Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com>]

Rewording the last sentence based on Mark's suggestion:

If a link crosses the boundary of the immediate child of 
<extensionActivity> element, then that element MUST be subject to 
mustUnderstand="yes".


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 250 - Proposal for Vote
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 10:58:43 -0400
From: Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com>
To: Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>
CC: Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>,  Mark Ford 
<mark.ford@active-endpoints.com>, 'wsbpeltc' <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
References: <200603312232.k2VMWkeN019331@mx1.tibco.com> 
<442DB106.6020904@tibco.com> <442DB44B.2000105@oracle.com> 
<442DB5B8.3090903@tibco.com>

Hi guys,

First, to help clarify, let's look at what the spec says today. It says,
if you DO NOT understand the extension then replace with/treat as <empty/>.


So, make that more specific and say

If a processor does NOT understand the extension, then the extension
activity is treated as an <empty> activity and all the standard elements
and standard attributes of the immediate child of the
<extensionActivity> are placed on this <empty/> activity. Notice that
any additional child elements or constructs of the extensionActivity are
dropped in this replacement:

<extensionActivity>
   <foo:myWierdness standard-attributes>
      standard-elements
   </foo:myWierdness>
</extensionActivity>

=>

<empty standard-attributes>
     standard-elements
</empty>

THEN, the resolution of this isssue would be to add the above
clarification and then to only adding this sentence:

If a link crosses the boundary of an <extensionActivity>, then the
element contained within the <extensionActivity> MUST be subject to
mustUnderstand="yes".