RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach

["Alejandro Guizar" <alex.guizar@jboss.com>]

successfulBranchesOnly does not make as much sense when you think about
it separately. However, when you place it in the context of the forEach
element:

<forEach successfulBranchesOnly="yes" />

the word "count" becomes somewhat redundant - forEach already conveys
the notion of counting. I like "successfulBranchesOnly", too.

-Alejandro

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dieter Koenig1 [mailto:dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:45 AM
> To: Danny van der Rijn
> Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly
in
> forEach
> 
> +1 -- "successfulBranchesOnly" is much better than the current
attribute
> as
> it contains the most important piece: "successful".
> 
> Kind Regards
> DK
> 
> 
> 
> 
>              Danny van der
>              Rijn
>              <dannyv@tibco.com
To
>              >                         wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
>
cc
>              06.04.2006 01:16
>
Subject
>                                        Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 -
Rename
>                                        countCompletedBranchesOnly in
>                                        forEach
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I agree with your logic.  Can we shorten it be removing "count":
> "successfulBranchesOnly"
> 
> Alejandro Guizar wrote:
>       +1, although the "Only" particle must remain to preserve the
> original
>       meaning: 'countSuccessfulBranchesOnly'
> 
>       'countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly' is way too long.
> 
>       -Alejandro
> 
> 
>       From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com]
>       Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:27 AM
>       To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
>       Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename
> countCompletedBranchesOnly
>       in forEach
> 
>       'countSuccessfulBranches' ?
> 
>       ws-bpel issues list editor wrote:
> 
> 
>       This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status
of
>       "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to
open
>       the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A
> motion
>       could also be proposed to close it without further
consideration.
>       Otherwise it will remain as "received".
> 
> 
>       The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to
the
>       OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition,
as a
>       TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled
in
>       the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next
> posting
>       as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's
working
>       copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced,
is
>       available at this constant URL.
> 
> 
>       Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach
>       Status: received
>       Date added: 5 Apr 2006
>       Categories: Syntax & validation
>       Date submitted: 05 April 2006
>       Submitter: Simon D Moser
>       Document: WS-BPEL 2.0 Specfication (05 Apr 2006)
>       Description: WS-BPEL's forEach activity defines an attribute
>       "countCompletedBranchesOnly". In section 11.7 it is clearly
defined
>       that a "completed" branch is only one that is sucessfully
completed.
>       Therefore, to avoid confusion, the attribute should be renamed
to
>       "countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly".
>       Submitter's proposal: Rename the forEach attribute
>       "countCompletedBranchesOnly" to
>       "countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly" in both the spec text
>       (wherever it occurs) and the BPEL Schema
>       Changes: 5 Apr 2006 - new issue
> 
> 
> 
>       To comment on this issue (including whether it should be
accepted),
>       please follow-up to this announcement on the
>       wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message
should
>       automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the
subject
>       line as you send it starts "Issue - 259 - [anything]" or is a
reply
>       to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution
to
> an
>       open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 259 -
Proposed
>       resolution", without any Re: or similar.
> 
> 
>       To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the
>       address for new issue submission is the sender of this
> announcement).
> 
> 
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>       To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that
>       generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your
TCs
> in
>       OASIS at:
>       https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
> 
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>       To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that
>       generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your
TCs
> in
>       OASIS at:
>       https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
> unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates
> this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php