[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach
Alejandro, the attribute actually resides on the branches element, but I
agree with the rest - this branches element is only about the number of
completed branches.
<forEach ...>
...
<completionCondition>
<branches successfulBranchesOnly="yes"> 42 </branches>
</completionCondition>
...
</forEach>
Kind Regards
DK
"Alejandro
Guizar"
<alex.guizar@jbos To
s.com> Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM@IBMDE,
"Danny van der Rijn"
06.04.2006 11:02 <dannyv@tibco.com>
cc
<wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename
countCompletedBranchesOnly in
forEach
successfulBranchesOnly does not make as much sense when you think about
it separately. However, when you place it in the context of the forEach
element:
<forEach successfulBranchesOnly="yes" />
the word "count" becomes somewhat redundant - forEach already conveys
the notion of counting. I like "successfulBranchesOnly", too.
-Alejandro
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dieter Koenig1 [mailto:dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:45 AM
> To: Danny van der Rijn
> Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly
in
> forEach
>
> +1 -- "successfulBranchesOnly" is much better than the current
attribute
> as
> it contains the most important piece: "successful".
>
> Kind Regards
> DK
>
>
>
>
> Danny van der
> Rijn
> <dannyv@tibco.com
To
> > wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
>
cc
> 06.04.2006 01:16
>
Subject
> Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 -
Rename
> countCompletedBranchesOnly in
> forEach
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I agree with your logic. Can we shorten it be removing "count":
> "successfulBranchesOnly"
>
> Alejandro Guizar wrote:
> +1, although the "Only" particle must remain to preserve the
> original
> meaning: 'countSuccessfulBranchesOnly'
>
> 'countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly' is way too long.
>
> -Alejandro
>
>
> From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:27 AM
> To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename
> countCompletedBranchesOnly
> in forEach
>
> 'countSuccessfulBranches' ?
>
> ws-bpel issues list editor wrote:
>
>
> This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status
of
> "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to
open
> the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A
> motion
> could also be proposed to close it without further
consideration.
> Otherwise it will remain as "received".
>
>
> The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to
the
> OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition,
as a
> TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled
in
> the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next
> posting
> as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's
working
> copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced,
is
> available at this constant URL.
>
>
> Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach
> Status: received
> Date added: 5 Apr 2006
> Categories: Syntax & validation
> Date submitted: 05 April 2006
> Submitter: Simon D Moser
> Document: WS-BPEL 2.0 Specfication (05 Apr 2006)
> Description: WS-BPEL's forEach activity defines an attribute
> "countCompletedBranchesOnly". In section 11.7 it is clearly
defined
> that a "completed" branch is only one that is sucessfully
completed.
> Therefore, to avoid confusion, the attribute should be renamed
to
> "countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly".
> Submitter's proposal: Rename the forEach attribute
> "countCompletedBranchesOnly" to
> "countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly" in both the spec text
> (wherever it occurs) and the BPEL Schema
> Changes: 5 Apr 2006 - new issue
>
>
>
> To comment on this issue (including whether it should be
accepted),
> please follow-up to this announcement on the
> wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message
should
> automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the
subject
> line as you send it starts "Issue - 259 - [anything]" or is a
reply
> to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution
to
> an
> open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 259 -
Proposed
> resolution", without any Re: or similar.
>
>
> To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the
> address for new issue submission is the sender of this
> announcement).
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your
TCs
> in
> OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your
TCs
> in
> OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
> unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates
> this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]