[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach
+1 to "successfulBranchesOnly" Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu Dieter Koenig1 wrote: Alejandro, the attribute actually resides on the branches element, but I agree with the rest - this branches element is only about the number of completed branches. <forEach ...> ... <completionCondition> <branches successfulBranchesOnly="yes"> 42 </branches> </completionCondition> ... </forEach> Kind Regards DK "Alejandro Guizar" <alex.guizar@jbos To s.com> Dieter Koenig1/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, "Danny van der Rijn" 06.04.2006 11:02 <dannyv@tibco.com> cc <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach successfulBranchesOnly does not make as much sense when you think about it separately. However, when you place it in the context of the forEach element: <forEach successfulBranchesOnly="yes" /> the word "count" becomes somewhat redundant - forEach already conveys the notion of counting. I like "successfulBranchesOnly", too. -Alejandro-----Original Message----- From: Dieter Koenig1 [mailto:dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 1:45 AM To: Danny van der Rijn Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnlyinforEach +1 -- "successfulBranchesOnly" is much better than the currentattributeas it contains the most important piece: "successful". Kind Regards DK Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.comTo> wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.orgcc06.04.2006 01:16SubjectRe: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 -RenamecountCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach I agree with your logic. Can we shorten it be removing "count": "successfulBranchesOnly" Alejandro Guizar wrote: +1, although the "Only" particle must remain to preserve the original meaning: 'countSuccessfulBranchesOnly' 'countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly' is way too long. -Alejandro From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:27 AM To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach 'countSuccessfulBranches' ? ws-bpel issues list editor wrote: This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a statusof"received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion toopenthe issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could also be proposed to close it without furtherconsideration.Otherwise it will remain as "received". The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document totheOASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition,as aTC document, is the most recent version of the document entitledinthe "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor'sworkingcopy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced,isavailable at this constant URL. Issue - 259 - Rename countCompletedBranchesOnly in forEach Status: received Date added: 5 Apr 2006 Categories: Syntax & validation Date submitted: 05 April 2006 Submitter: Simon D Moser Document: WS-BPEL 2.0 Specfication (05 Apr 2006) Description: WS-BPEL's forEach activity defines an attribute "countCompletedBranchesOnly". In section 11.7 it is clearlydefinedthat a "completed" branch is only one that is sucessfullycompleted.Therefore, to avoid confusion, the attribute should be renamedto"countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly". Submitter's proposal: Rename the forEach attribute "countCompletedBranchesOnly" to "countSuccessfullyCompletedBranchesOnly" in both the spec text (wherever it occurs) and the BPEL Schema Changes: 5 Apr 2006 - new issue To comment on this issue (including whether it should beaccepted),please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this messageshouldautomatically send your message to that list), or ensure thesubjectline as you send it starts "Issue - 259 - [anything]" or is areplyto such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolutiontoan open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 259 -Proposedresolution", without any Re: or similar. To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TCthatgenerates this mail. You may a link to this group and all yourTCsin OASIS at: https://www.oasis- open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TCthatgenerates this mail. You may a link to this group and all yourTCsin OASIS at: https://www.oasis- open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php ---------------------------------------------------------------------Tounsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]