[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - 264 - <correlationSet> specifications on <invoke> with @initiate="no" & @pattern="response" should be invalid
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could also be proposed to close it without further consideration. Otherwise it will remain as "received".
The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.
However the specific combination of @pattern="response" and @initiate="no" on an <invoke> should be invalid, as there is no need to supply a correlation set in a reply to an <invoke> if a new correlation set is not being initiated. The reply is automatically correlated with the original invoke and if a new correlation set is not being initiated, it is meaningless to supply a "different" correlation set in the response to the invoke.
In the Examples below (1) is valid but (2) should be invalid.
(1)
<invoke .....> <correlations> <correlation set="PurchaseOrder" initiate="yes" pattern="request"/> <correlation set="Invoice" initiate="yes" pattern="response"/> </correlations> </invoke>(2)
<invoke .....> <correlations> <correlation set="PurchaseOrder" initiate="yes" pattern="request"/> <correlation set="Invoice" initiate="no" pattern="response"/> </correlations> </invoke>
Clarify that for a <CorreltonSet> specification on <invoke> when the "pattern" attribute has the value "response", the "initiate" attribute can only have the value "yes" .
Changes: 14 Apr 2006 - new issue
To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 264 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 264 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.
To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]