[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 266 - resolution
Hi Mark and all, About the new sentence : "If the element contained within the extensibleAssign element is not recognized by the WS-BPEL processor and is not subject to a mustUnderstand="yes" requirement from an extension declaration then the extensibleAssign operation MUST be ignored. " May I suggest a change of location? Maybe adding to the end of the following paragraph instead: "In addition to <copy> specifications, other extensibility data manipulation elements MAY be included in an assign activity, inside an <extensibleAssign> element. The extensibility data manipulation elements MUST belong to a namespace different from the WS-BPEL namespace." Because, the paragraph that Mark mentioned is the introduction paragraph of <assign>, while the other paragraph is a later more detailed paragraph. A detailed rule may suit better in that location? Just a minor suggestion. Sound reasonable? Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu Diane Jordan wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]