[wsbpel] Issue - 287 - Proposal for Vote

[Dieter Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com>]

AMENDMENT

The previously submitted proposal is close to the original resolution of
issue 162. However, the scope name uniqueness constraint specified there is
still too restrictive and more difficult to enforce. As an alternative, I
amend this proposal with the following new proposal which ***only***
enforces the uniqueness of the <compensateScope> activity.

In section 10.1., ***delete***

   "The name of a named activity MUST be unique amongst all named
   activities present within the same immediately enclosing scope. This
   requirement MUST be statically enforced."
In section 12.4.3., ***add*** the following text as a new 4th paragraph:

   "The name of the activity referenced in the target attribute of the
   <compensateScope> activity MUST be unique. This requirement MUST be
   statically enforced."

Kind Regards
DK
                                                                       
 Dieter König                                Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com         IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
                                                                       
 Senior Technical Staff Member               Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426      Schönaicher Strasse 220
                                                                       
 Architect, Business Process Choreographer   Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890      71032 Böblingen
                                                                       
 Member, Technical Expert Council            Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464  Germany