Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 301 - Proposal for vote

[Simon D Moser <SMOSER@de.ibm.com>]

Hi all,

trying to come up with a formal proposal for Issue 301, I took the text
that is already in the spec for variables and adopted it to PartnerLinks.
The formal proposal reads:


In Chapter 8.4. Assignment, section PartnerLink variant, add a new second
paragraph (after line 2349 in revision 1.161):

An attempt during process execution to read a partnerLink before its
partnerRole EPR is initialized MUST result in the standard
bpel:uninitializedPartnerRole fault. Partner roles of partner links are
read when they are referenced in an <invoke> or the <from> part of a <copy>
in an <assign> activity.

**************************
update the fault definition in faultTable in Appendix A :

[from]

uninitializedPartnerRole: Thrown when an <invoke> activity is used on a
partner link whose partnerRole endpoint reference is not initialized.


[to]

uninitializedPartnerRole: Thrown when an <invoke> or <assign> activity
references a partner link whose partnerRole endpoint reference is not
initialized.

Cheers
/Simon
--------------------------------------------------
Simon Daniel Moser, M.Eng.
Business Process Solutions Development 1
IBM Boeblingen Laboratory
Schoenaicherstr. 220, 01/086
D - 71032 Boeblingen
Tel.: +49 - 7031 - 164304
IP Telephone Number (ITN): 39204304
email: smoser@de.ibm.com

Rule of thumb #3459835478: when you find yourself typing/copying the same
thing more than twice in a row, redesign or re-implement. No excuse
possible.