Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 301 - Proposal for vote

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

>moser: Hi all,
>trying to come up with a formal proposal for Issue 301, I took the text
>that is already in the spec for variables and adopted it to PartnerLinks.
>The formal proposal reads:
>
>In Chapter 8.4. Assignment, section PartnerLink variant, add a new second
>paragraph (after line 2349 in revision 1.161):
>  
>
mm1: Ron and I had draft language but had not decided where in the 
specification was most optimal. You beat us to the punch! These changes 
look acceptable. Thanks.

>An attempt during process execution to read a partnerLink before its
>partnerRole EPR is initialized MUST result in the standard
>bpel:uninitializedPartnerRole fault. Partner roles of partner links are
>read when they are referenced in an <invoke> or the <from> part of a <copy>
>in an <assign> activity.
>
>**************************
>update the fault definition in faultTable in Appendix A :
>
>[from]
>uninitializedPartnerRole: Thrown when an <invoke> activity is used on a
>partner link whose partnerRole endpoint reference is not initialized.
>
>[to]
>uninitializedPartnerRole: Thrown when an <invoke> or <assign> activity
>references a partner link whose partnerRole endpoint reference is not
>initialized.
>