Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations

[Thomas Schulze <ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com>]

Hi Prasad,

a portType definition like the following would lead to problems, IMHO:

    <portType name="My.Port.Type">
        <operation name="My.Operation">
            ...
        </operation>
    </portType>

Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

       Thomas Schulze



                                                                       
             Prasad Yendluri                                           
             <pyendluri@webmet                                         
             hods.com>                                                  To
                                       Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE
             24.07.2006 15:53                                           cc
                                       alex.yiu@oracle.com,            
                                       Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM,        
                                       wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org     
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: [wsbpel] new issue -        
                                       clarification on whether the QName
                                       of a fault needs to be unique   
                                       across all portTypes and operations
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       
                                                                       




Hi Thomas,

Why do we need such a limitation?  The local part is just an NCName
(i.e. the LocalPart of the QName).

Regards,
Prasad

Thomas Schulze wrote:

>Hi Prasad,
>
>so the only *new* limitation with this proposal would be that portTypes
and
>operatins must not contain the "." character when used with BPEL. Right?
>
>Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
>       Thomas Schulze
>
>
>