[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - R31 - Clarification for Section 10.4 Given R18 Resolution
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could also be proposed to close it without further consideration. Otherwise it will remain as "received".
The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.
(existing 10.4)
WS-BPEL treats faults based on abstract WSDL 1.1 operation definitions, without reference to binding details. This limits the ability of a WS-BPEL process to determine the information transmitted when faults are returned over a SOAP binding.
Reference: resolution of issue R18 (now correctly formatted in the issue list)
Submitter's proposal: Take an abbreviated approach for Section 10.4 and reference 10.3.
Change from:
WS-BPEL treats faults based on abstract WSDL 1.1 operation definitions, without reference to binding details. This limits the ability of a WS-BPEL process to determine the information transmitted when faults are returned over a SOAP binding.Change to:
WS-BPEL treats faults based on abstract WSDL 1.1 operation definitions. This limits the ability of a WS-BPEL process to determine the information transmitted when faults are returned, such as for a SOAP binding (See Section 10.3, Invoking Web Services Operations - Invoke for fault treatment).
To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - R31 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - R31 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.
To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]