Re: [wsbpel] new issue - [Fwd: [wsbpel] Issue R29 - proposal forpart (c)]

[Peter Furniss <peter@furniss.co.uk>]

Isn't this split from R32, not R29 ?

Assuming there aren't two split issues, this is R43. Though I'm not quite sure what the issue description should be.

Peter



Alex Yiu wrote:

Hi all,

As discussed during F2F, since R29 is closed, this proposal would become a new issue
[would be issue R43 (?)]



Regards,
Alex Yiu


-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	[wsbpel] Issue R29 - proposal for part (c)
Date:	Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:53:14 -0800
From:	Charlton Barreto <barreto@adobe.com>
To:	<wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>

To resolve Issue R29 (c), it is proposed that the use of partnerLinks be simplified in Section 15.2, the Template Profile example, by combining the multiple partnerLinks in the example: orderingResponse into ordering, shippingResponse into shipping, and invoiceResponse into invoice, using multiple portTypes and roles to represent the request/response relationships. Also, the use of initializePartnerRole has been updated.

 

-Charlton.