wsbpel message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Issue R48 - first part resolution
- From: Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:22:57 -0500
Resolution to R48 - first half as agreed on TC call
Jan 24.
In 10.3.1
From
[existing static analysis requirement SA00050] When
<toParts> is present in an <invoke>, it is not required to
have a <toPart> for every part in the WSDL message definition, nor
is the order in which parts are specified relevant. Parts not explicitly
represented by <toPart> elements would result in uninitialized parts
in the target anonymous WSDL variable used by the <invoke> or <reply>
activity. Such processes with missing <toPart> elements MUST be rejected
during static analysis.
To: [updated static analysis requirement SA00050]
When <toParts> is present, it is required to have a <toPart>
for every part in the WSDL message definition; the order in which parts
are specified is irrelevant. Parts not explicitly represented by <toPart>
elements would result in uninitialized parts in the target anonymous WSDL
variable used by the <invoke> or <reply> activity. Such processes
with missing <toPart> elements MUST be rejected during static analysis.
Also change static analysis table entry
Regards, Diane
IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]