Re: [wsbpel] Change to section 1.1 in the Primer as discussed on today'scall

[Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>]

I think the wording is that way because
it was talking about acronyms not the specs themselves - or sort of anyway.
 ;-)  
I think your suggestion is fine - but
then we should change the rest of the sentence too. How about:
From:
 WS-BPEL
is a revision of the original acronym BPEL4WS (Business Process Execution
Language for Web Services).  
 to:
 WS-BPEL
2.0 is a revision of BPEL4WS (Business Process
Execution Language for Web Services)1.0
and 1.1. 

Regards, Diane
IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709

"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Sent by: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM

04/25/2007 02:49 PM

To	Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	charlton_b@mac.com, wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [wsbpel] Change to section 1.1 in the Primer as discussed on today's call

Diane Jordan wrote:

> Hi Charlton,
>
> Here is the change we discussed on the call today.  Section 1.1
>
> From:
>
> WS-BPEL is an acronym for Web Services Business Process Execution
> Language. WS-BPEL is a revision of the original acronym BPEL4WS 
> (Business Process Execution Language for Web Services).  
>
> The preferred acronym is WS-BPEL for the following reasons:
>
> BPEL4WS refers to the 1.1 and 1.0 versions of the specification
>
> BPEL may cause confusion because it does not refer to either version
> of the specification
>
> To:
>
> WS-BPEL is an acronym for Web Services Business Process Execution
> Language. WS-BPEL is a revision of the original acronym BPEL4WS 
> (Business Process Execution Language for Web Services) which applies
> to the 1.1 and 1.0 versions of the specification.  
>
mm1: Diane, shouldn't second sentence start with "WS-BPEL v2.0 is
a 
revision..."? Thanks.

>
> Regards, Diane
> IBM  Emerging Internet Software Standards
> drj@us.ibm.com
> (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709
>