[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsdm] MUWS - 2.1.2 Message Exchange Patterns
Hi Geoff, Completely agree. request-response over the **same HTTP connection** is critical to support management from behind a firewall. /Pankaj. -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Bullen [mailto:geoff.bullen@webmethods.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:09 PM To: Wsdm (E-mail) Subject: [wsdm] MUWS - 2.1.2 Message Exchange Patterns Hi all, I remember as part of the discussion on this section it was suggested that if we just specify that we need an asynchronous protocol, then you can implement the single request/reply concept on top of this... so therefore you don't need to specify both. It is my belief that we definitely need to specify a direct request/response protocol. There are a number of cases where using firewalls makes it quite difficult to support asynchronous traffic (messages initiated from both ends) rather than the simpler request/reply - where messages are only initiated from one end. I am not suggesting we should not support async, but I think you should be able to create a management solution without it. Just my thoughts, Geoff You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.ph p
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]