RE: [wsdm] [OMod] Another try at "magic bullet"

["Sedukhin, Igor S" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>]

Ok, I agree.

PS. This is #4 isn't it :)... 


-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788

-----Original Message-----
From: VAMBENEPE,WILLIAM (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:vbp@hp.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:47 PM
To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsdm] [OMod] Another try at "magic bullet"


Igor and all,

What about the following proposal. Based on all discussions so far I get a sense this could be agreeable to everyone for both our 0.5 and 1.0
specifications:

MUWS defines in its "identity" category:

- ResourceID[1]: anyURI - unique ID of the resource managed.

MOWS defines in its "identification" category:

- EndpointReference[1]: styleTBD - [a WSDL (1.1 or 2.0) "service" element containing only one endpoint] OR [a wsa:EndpointReference element] OR [a complex type that includes each of the above as choices and possibly some other], whichever the working group decides to use for endpoint reference.
This is a separate issue, discussed in the Uplat area. We can postpone for a bit the decision on what endpoint reference format we use, but this should be consistent with the endpoint reference format we use for MUWS (for example to express participants in relationships). This property represents one way to access the resource but doesn't preclude the existence of multiple descriptions of the resource.

- EndpointDescriptions[0..n]: xsd:anyURI - a list of URIs pointing to descriptions of the resource. The different descriptions can be of the same or of different types (e.g. WSDL1.1, WSDL2.0, UDDI tModel...)

Regards,

William

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.php.