RE: [wsdm][MUWS] Identity Representation

["Vambenepe, William N" <vbp@hp.com>]

Title: Message

The model looks good to me too. And I agree that we probably don't need to worry about the schema right now.

 

Thanks Andreas. Will you incorporate this in the updated doc I sent you and upload the resulting doc?

 

William

-----Original Message-----
From: Sedukhin, Igor S [mailto:Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:41 AM
To: Andreas Dharmawan; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsdm][MUWS] Identity Representation

Model is fine.

I'm not sure we need XSDs right now. What for?
Also when we need XSD, I believe every property would need to be defined as its own element (for referncing and reuse, it would need a Qname). We may discuss that later. For now I suggest that we skip the XSD part altogether.

-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788

_____________________________________________
From:   Andreas Dharmawan [mailto:andreas@westbridgetech.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:57 PM
To:     wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:        [wsdm][MUWS] Identity Representation

Here are the two representations (UML and xsd) for MUWS Identity:

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >> the xsd:

<xsd:complexType name="Identity">
        <xsd:sequence>
                <xsd:element name="resource" type="xsd:anyURI" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"/>
                <xsd:element name="name" type="xsd:string" minOccurrs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
                <xsd:element name="version" type"=xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
        </xsd:sequence>
</xsd:compleType>

Feedback, comment?

Thanks

Andreas << File: ATT715240.txt >>