[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [MOWS Spec] Optional Dependency on MUWS
Hello, I am a bit concerned about the wording of Section 2.2. It would be nice to have some discussion on how optional we want the basic MUWS manageability capabilities to be. The new words Igor put into the 2 March version are good examples, but end up leaving the door open to it being completely optional whether to use MUWS or not. If we want to allow a particular domain to replace something in MUWS with something specific to their domain (say, a domain doesn't like the MUWS Resource States and replaces with their own Resource States), we need to be prescriptive on how to do so. Thanks. -- John DeCarlo, The MITRE Corporation, My Views Are My Own email: jdecarlo@mitre.org voice: 703-883-7116 fax: 703-883-3383 DISA cube: 703-882-0593
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]