|
Anthony, are you saying you would like policy to indicate which operation
belongs to which interface?
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Nadalin
[mailto:drsecure@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Mon 6/7/2004 10:46 PM
To: Sedukhin, Igor S
Cc: Heather Kreger;
wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsdm] capabilities
proposal
Sure, it makes sense to use policy here and manage via policy, WSDL 2.0
does not have everything we need, we have been down this path.
Anthony
Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122
 "Sedukhin, Igor S"
<Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
"Sedukhin, Igor S"
<Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
06/07/2004 09:36 PM |
|
Ok. Still, you'd specify operations input/output and binding to the
HTTP transport in the WSDL (components) itself, so it is only natural to
specify which interfaces these operations belong to in the WSDL too. I'm not
sure you want policy to contain such information, do you?
Besides WSDL 2.0 already has everything needed anyways. It is WSDL 1.1
that we're having troubles with.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Nadalin [mailto:drsecure@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Mon 6/7/2004 5:49 PM
To: Sedukhin, Igor S
Cc: Heather Kreger; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsdm] capabilities proposal
That's fine policy can be metadata (some real fine lines
are drawn here), I would not like to see WSDM go off and reinvent in the
policy/metadata space. IBM's view is that policy can be used to express
operational and metadata about operations, WSDL may be just one place to
express these there are many other places.
Anthony Nadalin | work
512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122
"Sedukhin, Igor S"
<Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
"Sedukhin, Igor S"
<Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>
06/07/2004 04:10
PM |
|
To |
Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Heather
Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS |
|
cc |
<wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org> |
|
Subject |
RE: [wsdm] capabilities
proposal |
|
This is operational metadata (just
like WSDL is). It may not resemble a policy, which is really metadata
about WSDL and what it defines.
The underlying reason may be same as
to why not use policy to express what operations and message exchanges are
supported. We use WSDL for that.
-- Igor Sedukhin ..
(igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 ..
1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY
11788
From:
Anthony Nadalin [mailto:drsecure@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:49 PM
To: Heather
Kreger
Cc: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsdm]
capabilities proposal
Why is this a proposed section in WSDM, seem like this is
just policy and intersection of policy
Anthony Nadalin | work
512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122
Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Heather
Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
06/07/2004 02:57
PM |
|
To |
wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org |
|
cc |
;) |
|
Subject |
[wsdm] capabilities
proposal |
|
Hi folks, Here is an initial proposal for discovering
capabilities. I think we may be able to use something like this for
discovering manageability services as well.
(See
attached file: Capabilities.wsdm.060404.doc)
This is just a proposal and we can discuss on
Thursday.
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for
SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable
Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)
cell:919-496-9572To unsubscribe from this mailing
list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
|
