[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [wsrf] Identity
Hi all, Forwarding an email from WSRF about our identity capability. Sam explains some of his requirements and wonders whether this belongs in WSRF or WSDM. Any thoughts from the group? William -----Original Message----- From: Samuel Meder [mailto:meder@mcs.anl.gov] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 8:57 AM To: wsrf-oasis Cc: Steve Tuecke; Karl Czajkowski; Frank Siebenlist Subject: [wsrf] Identity I brought up the issue of resource identity at the f2f (for e.g. writing policy about a resource) and was pointed at the work done in the WSDM TC. I've now taken a look at the WSDM spec and while it solves some of the issues I see (at least) a couple of problems: * Optimally this work should be factored out of WSDM. I believe that the solution to the problem of resource identity has wider applicability than just the management space so would benefit from separate treatment. Would this be possible within the charter of the WSRF TC? Any thoughts from WSDM? Another somewhat related issue is that support for identities should be more pervasive in the base specs, if only just to avoid chatty interfaces (e.g. a reply from any of the factory methods in the WSRF/WSN specs should also optionally return an identity). * The WSDM spec does not address the problem of how to resolve a identity to an address. A possible solution here is to to use servicegroups for both a discovery and resolution mechanism, but there are likely to be scalability issues with this approach. Another solution might be to leverage the web's caching infrastructure for a more scalable resolution mechanism. Is this something that the WSDM group is planning to address in the future? /Sam -- Sam Meder <meder@mcs.anl.gov> The Globus Alliance - University of Chicago 630-252-1752
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]