[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsdm] MUWS: New issue to consider?
Didn't we say in WSRF that you may use any of the embodiments you like e.g. WSA with reference properties element. The latter is what this is. -- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com) -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11749 -----Original Message----- From: fred carter [mailto:fred.carter@amberpoint.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:23 PM To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsdm] MUWS: New issue to consider? In reading the WS-Management spec the other day, one thing that sticks out as contextually different is that they describe a normative [I think] mapping to WS-Addressing. That is, they make specific reference to where the analogous concept to identity fits into the WS-Address. Do we need to map this? That is, to describe how to identify the resource in question in our WS-Address? I think that this is currently missing, and I don't recall seeing it specifically addressed in WSRF (and it couldn't be, since they don't have an identity capability...). Seems like we could say that there must exist a ref prop that's the same as the property in the property sheet in the WS-A. This leaves open discovery, but that's a separate problem... Opinions? /fred -- fred carter mailto:fred.carter@amberpoint.com To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgrou p.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]