wsdm message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsdm] MUWS Part 1 Comments
- From: Homayoun Pourheidari <homayoun@bea.com>
- To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:22:35 -0800
My comments for MUWS part 1, marked-up in William's 1127 version.
Cheers,
H.
---
Heather Kreger wrote:
Here are some comments on MUWS
Part 1 which might require some discussion.
I already sent a bunch of
editorial/clarification
on top of Mark Ellisons to William which are in the 1127 version of the
document.
Section 2.1: I’m not sure I
agree
that the contract includes discoverability. Certainly the contract
cannot
be exercised if it can’t be discovered. I think this just needs
rewording.
Section 2.1.1: There is some
concern
in IBM about confusing 'quality' here with the more general qos
concept.
Can we choose another word?
Section 4.1: I think we should
RECOMMEND ReportTime too.
Section 5.1.2: Section
ResourceId
Consitency - I think this is a MUST
Section 6: Should we add a WS-I
compliance requirement as a MUST or SHOULD?
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572
|
wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041127.doc
begin:vcard
fn:Homayoun Pourheidari
n:Pourheidari;Homayoun
org:WebLogic Integration
adr;dom:;;2315 North First St.;San Jose;CA;95131
email;internet:homayoun@bea.com
tel;work:+1 408.570.8175
version:2.1
end:vcard
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]