Re: [wsdm] MUWS Part 1 Comments

[Homayoun Pourheidari <homayoun@bea.com>]

My comments for MUWS part 1, marked-up in William's 1127 version.

Cheers,
H.
---

Heather Kreger wrote:

Here are some comments on MUWS Part 1 which might require some discussion.
I already sent a bunch of editorial/clarification on top of Mark Ellisons to William which are in the 1127 version of the document.

Section 2.1: I’m not sure I agree that the contract includes discoverability. Certainly the contract cannot be exercised if it can’t be discovered.  I think this just needs rewording.

Section 2.1.1: There is some concern in IBM about confusing 'quality' here with the more general qos concept. Can we choose another word?

Section 4.1: I think we should RECOMMEND  ReportTime too.

Section 5.1.2: Section ResourceId Consitency - I think this is a MUST

Section 6: Should we add a WS-I compliance requirement as a MUST or SHOULD?

Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572

wd-wsdm-muws-part1-1.0-20041127.doc

begin:vcard
fn:Homayoun Pourheidari
n:Pourheidari;Homayoun
org:WebLogic Integration
adr;dom:;;2315 North First St.;San Jose;CA;95131
email;internet:homayoun@bea.com
tel;work:+1 408.570.8175
version:2.1
end:vcard