wsdm message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Heather's relationships rewording AI
- From: "Vambenepe, William N" <vbp@hp.com>
- To: "Heather Kreger" <kreger@us.ibm.com>,"Mark Ellison" <ellison@ieee.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:36:32 -0800
Done.
ok for me!
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect
for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable
Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)
cell:919-496-9572
Mark Ellison
<ellison@ieee.org>
12/01/2004 04:09 PM
|
To
| Heather
Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| "Wsdm (E-mail)"
<wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| Re: [wsdm] Heather's
relationships rewording AI |
|
Heather,
For readability, might I suggest the
language inline...
Regards,
Mark
Heather Kreger wrote:
Heather will modify sentence in second para of 4.2.1
I would change:
In general, this capability is not more specific than what
is described above. That is, an endpoint MAY support any message exchanges it
needs to provide access to the relationship. The message exchanges may entirely
be management model specific.
to:
The endpoint in this
case is not a WSDM Manageable resource, merely a WS-Resource. The next section
describes relationships as WSDM Manageable resources. The relationship access
enpoint supports any message exchanges, which are relationship and management
model specific, that are needed to provide access to the relationship.
The endpoint in this case
is not a WSDM Manageable resource, merely a WS-Resource. The next section
describes relationships as WSDM Manageable resources. The relationship access
enpoint supports any exchange of messages, where the exchange is specific to a
particular relationship and management model, and, where the exchange is
necessary in order to provide access to the relationship.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]