[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Groups - WSDM Primer: An introduction to WSDM (wd-wsdm-primer-introduction_v1.doc) modified
Vaughn, In reading over section 1.1, I think the whole section should be whacked--don't waste time trying to rewrite it. It should be transferred to an "Introduction" of the Primer itself. The standalone document should start off with the Overview of WSDM section--IMO. Kirk Wilson Architect, Development Office of the CTO 802 765-4337 -----Original Message----- From: Vaughn Bullard [mailto:vbullard@amberpoint.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 9:52 AM To: Wilson, Kirk D; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [wsdm] Groups - WSDM Primer: An introduction to WSDM (wd-wsdm-primer-introduction_v1.doc) modified Hey Kirk, No problemo Senor. Heather had stated that it would be a good idea to put all the editors under the editor heading. Yesterday I had the entire revision history in there but was deciding if this was a new document, then it should probably have a new revision history. Exclusion was not the concept there. My other comments are listed below: Vaughn -----Original Message----- From: Wilson, Kirk D [mailto:Kirk.Wilson@ca.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 8:10 AM To: vbullard@amberpoint.com; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [wsdm] Groups - WSDM Primer: An introduction to WSDM (wd-wsdm-primer-introduction_v1.doc) modified Just some general comments on an initial scan of the document. 1. The double colons in the title look strange (IMHO). I would suggest dropping the first colon between Management and Primer. Or better yet, just drop "Primer:" (see point 3). >> Ahh, no problemo on this one. I thought so to. Will fix. 2. Since I basically wrote the first chapter (weaknesses, mistakes and all, for which I take full responsibility), would it be appropriate that I also be listing as an "editor"? (I realize that usually the specification lists only the editor rather than the authors, but this single chapter may well count as an exception. Otherwise, please clean up the revision history to be more explicit about this history of this particular volume.) >> I am going to put the editors in there. Providing this gives insight into the mind of the crafters of this doc. I'm just editing it. Don't feel at all bad about me correcting grammar, >> mistakes, etc. That's what editing is all about. This is a group effort. It's always better to have more than one head working on the same problem. And remember I'm a German >> Engineer!!! 3. I think there's a question we need to decide regarding section 1.1 (Overview of the Primer). If this stand-alone document is to be read as a separate document introducing the fundamentals of WSDM, then this section probably needs to be cleaned up, e.g., statement such as "Examples are developed throughout this primer..." need to be abstracted into just a statement about the structure of WSDM. If this introduction is to be published as part of the Primer, then leaving section 1.1 as it stands makes sense. How are we presenting this document? (I thought it was to be a handout at the EMW, in which case I would drop "Primer:" from the title and rewrite some of section 1.1. Also, I would probably not refer to "this primer" in the text of this document.) How are we publishing the Primer? (As one volume or multiple volumes? How will the introductory section be published with a multi-volume primer? If we keep it as a standalone document, the some of section 1.1 as it currently standards should be part of a very short introductory section the current Primer.) Also, the final paragraph that is currently in this draft should be dropped from a standalone document, but included in a short introduction to the primer itself. >> I saw the "examples are developed" phrase and was going to fix that. Apologize but it got toward 11 pm last night and I was just slightly tired. 4. The first subsection under section should be 2.1, not 2.1.1? >> Will Fix 5. Since section 1 of the full Primer is still undergoing revisions, we have a problem in keeping this standalone document in sync with the "master". For example, changes are under consideration for the discussion on the Model Agnostic section (section 2.1.1.4, which should be 2.1.4). >> I too, was wondering do we keep it as a separate doc. What will be the maintenance implications of this? Kirk Wilson Architect, Development Office of the CTO 802 765-4337 -----Original Message----- From: vbullard@amberpoint.com [mailto:vbullard@amberpoint.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 10:30 PM To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [wsdm] Groups - WSDM Primer: An introduction to WSDM (wd-wsdm-primer-introduction_v1.doc) modified Information about the document named WSDM Primer: An introduction to WSDM (wd-wsdm-primer-introduction_v1.doc) has been modified by Mr. Vaughn Bullard. Document Description: View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/document.php?document_ id=14319 Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/download.php/14319/wd- wsdm-primer-introduction_v1.doc PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. -OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]