RE: [wsdm] Comments on MOWS 1.1

["Vaughn Bullard" <vbullard@amberpoint.com>]

Yeah,

 

No problem.  I'm flying today back to DC after the con call and I'm working from home tomorrow, so I have time to make any changes. 

Folks in the WSDM committee should review everything just to ensure that I've got everything.  Most of the changes that I can make are structural and content-based.  Any kind of grammatical stuff, kind of gets lotst in the mix sometimes.  One's eyes tend to get cross-eyed when looking at the same stuff for 8 months.  :)

 

I do believe Units would be another change request.  We just have to manage this a little more carefully, so we don't become (dare I say) a "moving spec" for this version of the standard. 

 

We should get everybody's needed changes and then set a very specific suspense date.  Then I will make those changes and post them up as quickly as possible.

 

BTW, I don't see any of the "funny s-ish" stylings in any of Kirk's docs.  Probably an MS Word setting.

 

Thanks,

Vaughn

---

From: Wilson, Kirk D [mailto:Kirk.Wilson@ca.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 5:43 AM
To: Heather Kreger; wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Comments on MOWS 1.1

Thanks, Heather, for the careful reading.

 

Is inclusion of Units in metrics an official Change Request?  Should we discuss it on today’s conf call?  Shouldn’t the change to the spec be made in MUWS in Part 2 (sorry Vaughn—perhaps more work for you)?

 

I think the “funny s-ish”  is the section symbol.  I’ll do a universal change of it to the word “section”.

 

I check the URIs and, yes, I did have the incorrect URI for WSA (wrong date).  That should be corrected in the version I uploaded earlier this week (what version were you looking at?)

 

Kirk Wilson
Architect, Development

Office of the CTO

603 823-7146

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Heather Kreger [mailto:kreger@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:46 PM
To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsdm] Comments on MOWS 1.1

 

Hi,
Whew!
Here's comments on MOWS 1.1 by line number

43 - Broken Refs
182 - whats the funny s-ish sort of symbol everywhere?
199 - grammer hard, suggest: 'It is necessary to understand a number of important aspects of the WSDM architecture. ...'
229 - please substitute 'sufficient' for 'good'
241 - formatting problems
425 - check the URIs for RF, N, and A
610 - I think we need to add 'Units' to all the metrics metadata,
658 -  there's no units for ServiceTime at all, even in the text
720 - suggest change 'some kind' to 'some kind at a particular time'.

all events sections - need to add that Property change events will be wrapped in Management events and published on the topics defined in that section.

1587 - no bold
1630, 1639 - is the WSA schema right?  Isn't there a new one?  What is RF and N using?

Refs look good... Vaughn, can you use these for MUWS ?

Great job Kirk... appreciate all the hard work!
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572