wsdm message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsdm] Units
- From: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:11:13 -0500
Since the MOWS schema already has the
enumeration,
I'm happy to continue to use it and
use 'byte'.
Thanks,
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572
"Wilson, Kirk D"
<Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
02/23/2006 01:52 PM
|
To
| <wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [wsdm] Units |
|
All, just as a verification of what Bryan
was saying about units, I happened to notice the following in the MOWS
schema
<xs:simpleType name="MessageSizeUnitType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value="bit"/>
<xs:enumeration value="byte"/>
<xs:enumeration value="word"/>
<xs:enumeration value="dword"/>
<xs:enumeration value="qword"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
I’ve added to the following to the metadata
on the size Metrics in MOWS:
<muws2:Units>Bytes</muws2.Units>
Any recommendations? Just leave it
as is or change the metadata to “byte”.
Kirk Wilson
CA Inc.
Architect, Development
Office of the CTO
Tele: + 1 603 823-7146
Fax: + 1 603 823-7148
<mailto:kirk.wilson@ca.com>
- References:
- Units
- From: "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]