wsdm message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 2, Final review and vote for CD
- From: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:03:51 -0500
cd-02 indicates its Committee Draft
of Part 2, the *A.,doc document is Vaughns edits.
In the A.hk.doc I addressed the issues
in my note (additional changes) and left it as markup so everyone could
see and we can review what I've done. I implemented Tom's SequenceNumber
and made some changes to how Vaughn addressed some of your comments on
the WS-Addressing reference parameters and the relationship events.
Whew! We should review and approve
the A.hk.doc document today.
Do you need to update the schema appendix
in MUWS Part 1 or 2 to fix the copy/paste error?
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572
"Wilson, Kirk D"
<Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
03/09/2006 07:04 AM
|
To
| Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 2, Final
review and vote for CD |
|
I must say I’m thoroughly
confused by what version of what MUWS Part I need to review. What
is the relationship between the file ending in “A.hk” and the one uploaded
ending just in “A”? Are they the same? The situation is not
helped by the fact that the file names don’t designate the MUWS part (or
is that what the “cd-02” is meant to do?
Kirk Wilson
Architect, Development
Office of the CTO
603 823-7146
-----Original Message-----
From: Heather Kreger [mailto:kreger@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:38 AM
To: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsdm] WSDM MUWS 1.1 Part 2, Final review and vote for CD
Hi,
Its taken a little longer than expected to finish up the CD candidate for
MUWS 1.1. Part 2 due to technical difficulties. I believe this draft
to include all agreed on changes and responses to Kirks comments on the
previous draft.
Here's our agenda for todays call:
1. Roll
2. Review naming conventions for documents
3. MUWS 1.1 Part 2 changes review
4. Vote MUWS 1.1 to Committee Draft
CELEBRATE!
Changes made in this draft of MUWS 1.1:
Changes approved from last call:
1.
replace
section 2.5.1.2 470-519 with those in Tom Studwells posting 470-519 for
Correlation Properties with fixes in schema.
2.
Rename to
CorrellationProperties to EventCorrellationProperties
3.
Font size
508-520
4.
Deleting
diagram at 623
5.
Fix notification
references
6.
1404 –
add statement ‘For releationships as a stand alone resource, Self should
not be specified.’ (Heather)
7.
2002 make
Sequence an attribute (Heather)
8.
Remove *PropertiesType
declarations (Kirk to change)
9.
Add CopySection
with element declarations in WSDL (Kirk to change)
10.
GED for Self element (Kirk
to change)
Other changes made based on Kirks editorial commentts:
1. Rewrote 136-142 to align with current WS-RF and WS-A (I readded
a paragraph I think was mistakenly deleted)
2. Reformatted 2.5.1.4 Message Catalog section
3. 4.1.3 removed ref to 'manageaable relationships' and put description
of topics back in, I think I've fixed Kirk's origional concern about the
topic name.
4 minor space and '.' removal throughout.
The XML schema and WSL were correct and did not need to be updated or reverified.
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]