[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsn] Comments on Base Notif
Hi William, I am doing a consistency review of WS-BrokeredNotification based on your latest mods to WS-Topics. - I noticed that WS-Topics has section 1.1 labeled as "Terminology", and section 2 is "Terminology and Concepts". In WS-BrokeredNotification, section 1.1 is labeled "Notational Conventions" which avoids this overlap. - Should the "References" section in WS-Topics also refer to WS-BrokeredNotification? For that matter, WS-Topics does not appear to have a "Relationship to other specifications" section. There are references to notification brokers in WS-Topics but no formal explanation of what one is, or where to go find out about one. There is such a section in WS-BrokeredNotification that you can draw from as a starting point. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Vambenepe, William N [mailto:vbp@hp.com] > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 10:47 PM > To: wsn@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [wsn] Comments on Base Notif > > > Steve, > > While producing the draft for WS-Topics I found a few small > problems in the current draft of WS-BaseNotif: > > The "location" at the top of WSBN does not include the date > part in the URI. > > In the last sentence of the "status" section, replace "WSRF" > with "WSN" > > At the end of the first paragraph of "terminology", make a > proper reference to RFC2119. > > In the reference section, you link to the white paper points > to the member-only site. You should use the public URL for > this document: > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/6661/WSNpubs > ub-1-0.pdf > > Since we are going to end up publishing pdf docs, you should > change your references to WSRL and WSRP to ending in .pdf > > Regards, > > William > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]