Since there doesn't seem to be any disagreement that this is worth at
least clarifying, can you add an issue for this Sanjay? One question is whether
we just need to clarify the text or we also want to create special faults for
this.
Thanks,
William
Steve Graham wrote:
I agree the wording could be improved to state that
the production of an EPR to a subscription is the result of successful
processing of the subscribe request.
+1
++++++++ Steve Graham (919)254-0615 (T/L
444) STSM, On Demand Architecture Member, IBM Academy of
Technology <Soli Deo Gloria/> ++++++++
Hi
all,
Alan Weissberger pointed a potential issue in
WS-BaseNotification:
Section 4.2 says: "As part of the processing of
a Subscribe request message, the NotificationProducer MUST create a
Subscription resource representing the Subscription. It returns an
EndpointReference in the response to the Subscribe request."
This
does not leave the option to refuse to create this subscription, if for
example the NotificationProducer does not support the topic requested, or
the subscriber does not have adequate permissions or
the NotificationProducer has reached max capacity or any other
reason.
The suggestion is to soften the wording to allow this and to
define fault message(s) to express this.
Any comment or opposition
to adding this as an
issue?
Regards,
William
|