[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsn] Fw: documenting pseudo schema lang
The current text
in the Terminology sections of the WS Notification specifications does not
properly cover the pseudo schema notation.
The WSDL 2.0 group currently has
a similar "to do" item. Instead of inventing a separate description for the
pseudo schema language, the WS
Notification group can reuse the corresponding text published by the WSDL 2.0
group in the future (and insert the same into the Terminology and Notations
sections of the WS Notification specifications).
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsn/200406/msg00054.html
Steve Graham, Jeff Mischkinsky,
Anish Karmarkar
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Graham [mailto:sggraham@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Jun 15, 2004 7:45 AM
To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org; wsn@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana
Subject: [wsn] Fw: documenting pseudo schema lang
(Cross-post from the WSDL WG in W3C)
Note: Per the WSRF TC telecon yesterday [1], there was discussion from Jeff and Anish about the description of the pseudo schema and the text in the terminology and notation section of each document. I got some time to further review this text, and see what other WS-* specs use and realize that the current text in the WSRF (and WSN) specs don't really properly cover the pseudo-schema notation.
It seems that WSDL 2.0 WG has a similar "to do". I propose that whatever text the editors of WSDL 2.0 spec draft is the text we should insert into the notation and terminology section of WSRF and WSN specs to properly explain the pseudo-schema notation.
[1]http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/7266
sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
----- Forwarded by Steve Graham/Raleigh/IBM on 06/15/2004 10:37 AM -----
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org06/15/2004 10:35 AM
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc:
Subject: documenting pseudo schema lang
We use a "natural" pseudo-schema language in the spec in the XML
syntax fragments and summary. However, unless I missed something
its not documented .. this is an editorial task but obviously
critical!
Sanjiva.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]