[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsn] Multiple endpoints in IRP?
Yes, it is an accepted requirement of the WSDM TC to provide a "collection" mechanism. William -----Original Message----- From: David Hull [mailto:dmh@tibco.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:45 PM To: Vambenepe, William N Cc: Steve Graham; wsn@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsn] Multiple endpoints in IRP? Yes, I now realize I misread the original statement. However, I'm still curious whether the WSRF subgroup will be exploring means of multiple addressing. Vambenepe, William N wrote: >(with my TC member hat on, not my chair hat) > >The statement you pointed out is really just a reinforcement of the >rules of the IRP. And, as Steve says, it doesn't imply any capability >to address WS-Resources as groups. Or did I misunderstand your question >David? > >William > > >________________________________ > >From: Steve Graham [mailto:sggraham@us.ibm.com] >Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 1:43 PM >To: David Hull >Cc: wsn@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [wsn] Multiple endpoints in IRP? > > > >hi David: >I would think that one of our WSDM colleagues could comment further. >But from my read of the statement you quoted from WSDM MUWS, it was >simply observing that a manageability endpoint (eg a Web service >endpoint) may be the front end for multiple resources. Therefore the >IRP must be used to identify any single one of those resources. I >didn't get the read that there was any capability implied to access a >group of more than one resource with a single EPR. This is not >possible from what I understand of WS-Addressing. > >sgg > >++++++++ >Steve Graham >(919)254-0615 (T/L 444) >STSM, On Demand Architecture >Member, IBM Academy of Technology ><Soli Deo Gloria/> >++++++++ > > > > > David Hull <dmh@tibco.com> > >08/05/2004 04:14 PM > > > To: wsn@lists.oasis-open.org > cc: > Subject: [wsn] Multiple endpoints in IRP? > > > >While reading through WSDM MUWS, I ran across this interesting >statement: > >"If the manageability endpoint corresponds to a variable number (zero >or > >more) of manageable resources, then the WSRF Implied Resource Pattern >MUST be followed. This means that the element(s) listed in the >ReferenceProperties of a WS-Resource qualified EPR must be included in >the header of messages sent to such manageability endpoints." > >This seems to imply a WS-Address with multiple ReferenceProperties >elements, one for each EPR. > >Does the IRP allow for multiple resources to be addressed as a group? >Does this have to be done via repeated ReferenceProperties elements, or >could one give a predicate instead, or bake something magic into the >Address URI? > >I realize that the IRP is in a fluid state at the moment, but I'd be >interested to know current thinking. Is this the sort of issue the >WSRP > >subgroup is trying to address? > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]