wsn message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Cross post: [wsdm] Ws-addressing version
- From: Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsn@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:43:27 -0500
Please see the email discussion on WSDM
included below.
I recall discussing the issue of moving
WSN to the W3C Member submission version of WS-Addressing at the Oct f2f.
But the minutes seem to include only the soap:Action/wsa:Action resolution
(ie the stuff related to WSRF issue #30).
WSRF 43 was resolved, instructing the
editors of the WSRF specs to move to the W3C Member submission version.
WS-Resource [1] makes a normative reference
to the W3C Member submission version of WS-Addressing.
I suggest that we amend the resolution
of WSN 2.15 from:
"Agreed
Approach: Editors to borrow text from the WS-RF issue #30 resolution."
to
"Agreed
Approach: Editors to borrow text from the WS-RF issue #30 resolution and
the WS-RF issue #43 resolution."
sgg
[1]http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/9547/_Toc84417527
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
----- Forwarded by Steve
Graham/Raleigh/IBM on 11/17/2004 07:36 AM -----
Steve Graham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
11/17/2004 07:27 AM
|
To
| "Vambenepe, William
N" <vbp@hp.com>
|
cc
| wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| Re: [wsdm] Ws-addressing
version |
|
I believe it is preferable to move WSDM to reference the W3C member submission
version of WSA.
I believe that WSN and WSRF are doing that anyway.
In WSRF, issue WSRF43 [1] was resolved at the Oct F2F, with the resolution
being:
"Update specifications
that reference WS-Addressing to refer to the version submitted to the W3C.
This includes all namespace references and examples. Make sure to update
the WSDL and schema in addition to the specification text. The version
to reference is the August 2004 version submitted to the W3C."
In WSN, issue WSN2.15 [2] was also resolved at the Oct F2F, with the resolution
being:
"Agreed Approach: Editors
to borrow text from the WS-RF issue #30 resolution."
Now, WSRF30 is a slightly different issue (deals with use of wsa:Action
MIH), but WSRF30 cross references WSRF43. I suspect that the resolution
to WSN2.15 should reference WSRF43, but that seems to be a matter we should
take up with the WSN TC.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/10042/WSRF_IssuesList.doc
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/9948/WSN_IssuesList1.75.doc
sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
"Vambenepe, William
N" <vbp@hp.com>
11/17/2004 01:00 AM
|
To
| <wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [wsdm] Ws-addressing version |
|
What version of WS-Addressing do we want to reference? The one submitted
to W3C in August? Or the one used by version 1.2 of the WSRF/WSN specs
(that'd the March 2003 one, two versions older than the W3C-submitted
one).
On the one hand it would make sense to align with the one used by WSRF,
on the other hand it seems a bit silly for a new spec like ours to
reference such an old version.
Thoughts?
William
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]