Clarification of the status of WSN 2.24

[Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>]

I am confused about the status
of WSN 2.24.  From the reading of the text (included below) in the
issues list, I thought we had an agreed resolution to this issue from the
Oct f2f.  Why is this issue still marked as status: open?

I move that we change the status
of this item to Open –
approach agreed

sgg

        WSN2.24:
Use of term -- Implied Resource Pattern 
In several places in the specifications,
references are made to IRP and how its use is mandated.

Issue: The precise semantics of IRP is unclear and currently being worked on by WS-RF.

        Specifications

·        WS-BaseNotification
        Proposed Recommendations

WSN specifications to be updated based on the IRP revision under WSRF.

        Notes

This is the second out of the three issues substituting issue WSN2.2

During London F2F on July 30, 2004, this issue was marked as blocked on -- pending IRP clarification from WSRF.

The group agreed to revisit this issue before publishing the next WSN specification drafts. Ideally, the WSRF TC should have resolved the IRP clarification issue before WSN publishes the next specification drafts.

During Oct 04 F2F, this issue was discussed. WS-Resource specification was presented that clarifies the semantics of what was before called as – Implied Resource Pattern.  

It was agreed to replace the utterances of Implied Resource Pattern in all the WS-N specification with WS-Resource Access Pattern, the new terminology introduced by the WS-Resource specification.

        Status:   Open

Date: July 29, 2004

        Contact:

David Hull

        Cross Reference:

Previous issue: WSN2.2

++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++