[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsn] www.producer.org
As a suggestion, we could adopt the following convention for the <wsa:address> in all our examples http://www.example.com/xxx where xxx is the name of the "interface" implemented by the endpoint, e.g. http://www.example.com/SubscriptionManager http://www.example.com/NotificationConsumer I have put this on the agenda for today's call "Springer, Ian P." <ian.springer@hp. To com> Peter Niblett/UK/IBM@IBMGB, <wsn@lists.oasis-open.org> 14/10/2005 23:20 cc Subject RE: [wsn] www.producer.org The common practice is to use example.com, example.net, and/or example.org as described in RFC 2606 [1]. [1] http://rfc.net/rfc2606.html | -----Original Message----- | From: peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com [mailto:peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com] | Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 5:30 PM | To: wsn@lists.oasis-open.org | Subject: [wsn] www.producer.org | | The non-normative examples in both Base and Brokered | Notification use supposedly fictional endpoints that start | www.producer.org. | | This address appears to have been registered by an online | gaming site (maybe this explains some of our Public Review feedback). | | I'm inclined to think that it is inappropriate for us to use | this in our examples. Is anyone aware of a safe address that | we could use instead? |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]