Re: [wsrf] WS-RF ballot to publish working drafts closes 11AM Eastern on Friday 18 - please vote if you have not already done so.

[Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>]

Those are good suggestions, Martin.  In addition, I recorded the
following comment along with my vote:

  It is not necessary to approve publication of working drafts, unless
  they are to be considered Committee Drafts.  The OASIS TC Process
  requires that all work be done in the open and made available to the
  public at all times, either via the TC mailing list or document
  repository.  If the purpose of this ballot is to approve changes
  made by the editors that have not yet been explicitly approved by
  the TC, then the motion should be worded accordingly.

--Pete

Thus spoke Martin Chapman (martin.chapman@oracle.com) on Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:43:10PM +0100:
> Just a suggestion going forward on labelling documents.
> 
> The convention used in many groups is to use the term editors draft for
> any version produced by the editors, 
> 
> and to use the term working draft for those versions that have been
> adopted by the group as the next baseline.
> 
> Also we really should set up an editors subgroup in which intermediate
> versions can be posted, and reserve the group wide doc repository just
> for working drafts.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Martin.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com] 
> Sent: 17 June 2004 15:35
> To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [wsrf] WS-RF ballot to publish working drafts closes 11AM
> Eastern on Friday 18 - please vote if you have not already done so.
> 
> The WS-RF ballot to publish working drafts closes 11AM Eastern on Friday
> 18 - please vote if you have not already done so. 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/ballot.php?id=472 
> 
> 
> Thanks to those that have already voted. 
> Ian 

-- 
Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)