OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsrf message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [wsrf] WSRF WSDL problems with MS tooling (fwd)


The only benefit I saw of having two namespaces was that the namespaces could be the location URLs of the xsd and the wsdl. The big con is that it's much more error-prone from a developer perspective.

________________________________

From: Steve Graham [mailto:sggraham@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tue 11/2/2004 10:32 AM
To: Springer, Ian P.
Cc: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsrf] WSRF WSDL problems with MS tooling (fwd)



well, we have tried out having separate namespace for wsdl, and I am not sure there is much benefit.  One fewer namespace uri is probably a good thing. 

++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++




"Springer, Ian P." <ian.springer@hp.com> 

11/02/2004 09:54 AM 

To
<wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org> 
cc
Subject
RE: [wsrf] WSRF WSDL problems with MS tooling (fwd)	

		




| However, as Steve has pointed out, we could avoid using xsd:include by
| putting all the schema material in a single file (per spec).

You wouldn't necessarily have to put all the schema material in the xsd file. The wsdl types/schema could use the wsdl namespace (or any namespace other than the xsd namesapce) as its targetNamespace and then xsd:import the xsd file into the xsd namespace. This would allow you to continue following the current convention of putting all Request/Response/Fault types in the wsdl and all "data" types in the xsd, with the difference being that the Request/Response/Fault types would live in the wsdl namespace.

Ian


________________________________

From: Peter Niblett [mailto:peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Tue 11/2/2004 6:56 AM
To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsrf] WSRF WSDL problems with MS tooling (fwd)








Glenn

I've had a quick read of the WS-I basic profile, and I can't see anywhere
where it says you should not use include. It seems to be more concerned
that you should not use wsdl:import to import schema definitions.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]