RE: [wsrf] Issue 30 resolution text question

["Latha Srinivasan" <Latha.Srinivasan@hp.com>]

I interpreted the Issue Resolution to be whatever is going to be in the
"Action" part of the SOAP header. So, in my case, for the "Destroy" message,
my normative text would be:


"If a SOAPAction URI is included in the transport portion of the message, it
MUST contain the URI:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2004/11/wsrf-WS-ResourceLifetime/Destroy";

I would like to be consistent with the other specs. in resolving this issue.
-Latha


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Maguire [mailto:tmaguire@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 2:22 PM
To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
Subject: [wsrf] Issue 30 resolution text question





Quick question.  Issue 30 leaves the structure of the URI open to the
editor.  Do we want to have the URI match the specification versioning
structure?  For example in WS-ServiceGroup for the Add operation:

   If a SOAPAction URI is included in the transport portion of the Add
   message, it MUST contain the URI
 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2004/11/wsrf-WS-ServiceGroup-1.2-draft-03/
   Add.


Tom

Problems cannot be solved at the same level of awareness that created them. 
—Albert Einstein T o m   M a g u i r e STSM, On Demand Architecture


Poughkeepsie, NY  12601