RE: [wsrf] [WSRF Issue 81] clarification

["Murray, Bryan P." <bryan.murray@hp.com>]

I believe that the statement about WS-I was made at the October face-to-face although my memory is notoriously faulty. I searched through email and meeting minutes and did not find discussion of this point.

 

Unless someone can point out the requirement in WS-I BP, I suggest we remove that statement from the issue.

 

Bryan

---

From: Steve Graham [mailto:sggraham@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:14 AM
To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrf] [WSRF Issue 81] clarification

The current issues list contains an 
entry for WSRF 81 that includes:

Issue WSRF81: Recommendation to change WSDL documents

Some tooling does not correctly handle xsd:include.

WS-I compliance requires that xsd:include not be used.

Specifications

·        All WSDL documents

Notes

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrf/200410/msg00113.html

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrf/200410/msg00120.html

Proposed Recommendations

Change all WSDL documents so that xsd:include is not used. This can be accomplished by changing the namespace of the schema in the WSDL types section and using xsd:import instead.

Status: Open since November 15, 2004

Contact: Glenn Wassen, Abdeslem Djaoui

Cross Reference:

Now, the notion "WS-I compliance requires that xsd:include not be used." is puzzling.  I cannot see reference in WS-I BP 1.1 that forbids use of xsd:include, please clarify.

sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++