[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrf] Reopen Issue WSRF110
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Maguire [mailto:tmaguire@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, Jun 20, 2005 9:38 AM > To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [wsrf] Reopen Issue WSRF110 > > The proposed recommendation to WSRF110 was the addtion of an > xs:any ##other > to the BaseFaultType. This introduces a schema validation error for > extensions. > > Text from Peter Niblett: > If you extend the BFType in another namespace (as we do) and add extra > elements in that extension, then the schema that does the > extension (e.g. > WSN) violates the Unique Particle Attribution constraint as > it becomes > non-determnistic. This is because BaseFaultType ends with <xs:any > namespace="##other" minOccurs="0">. So in the extended fault > type you can't > tell whether elements in an extended instance are to be > validated by this > <any> or by the elements in the extended type > > > We need to reopen and revisit the proposed recommendation > (and subsequent > action). > > > > Tom > > > Frey's Law: "Every 5 years the number of architecture > components double and > the ability to comprehend them halves" > > > Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to > add, but when > there is nothing left to take away. - Antoine de Saint-Exupery > > > T o m M a g u i r e > > > STSM, On Demand Architecture > > > Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]