PR comment

[Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>]

PR2 comment received on Oct 20th:

Comment from: masahiro.kurosawa.kc@hitachi.com

Name: Masahiro Kurosawa
Title: Re: Give us more examples about MembershipContentRule
Organization: Hitachi, ltd.
Regarding Specification: WS ServiceGroup 1.2 pr02
(
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/14802/wsrf-ws_service_group-1.2-spec-pr-02.pdf
)
- - -
Thanks for your time and help on my question (Issue WSRF154).

About question #2 and #3, I completely understand. Thanks again for your
recommendations.

But, about question #1, I meant to say '{
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2004/11/wsrf-WS-ResourceLifetime-1.2-draft-04.wsdl}

ImmediateResourceTermination'. Intention of this question is:

- When a ServiceGroup WS-Resource wants its ServiceGroupEntrie WS-Resources
to support the operation(s) of ImmediateResourceTermination portType in
their portType

- and Name of that portTypes are actually something like '{
http://entry1.com/services}SomePortType',

- should it specify '{
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2004/11/wsrf-WS-ResourceLifetime-1.2-draft-04.wsdl}

ImmediateResourceTermination' in MemberInterfaces attribute, or '{
http://entry1.com/services}SomePortType'?


I think the former one is right because the names of portTypes are of great
variety and it's meaningless to specify '{
http://entry1.com/services}SomePortType'. But, I could not decide it.

Yes, I'll be able to understand after getting the examples.

Thanks.

Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com