Notes
from the OASIS WSRF TC
Teleconference
12th December 2005
Roll Call
The roll call is kept
on the TC web site under the meeting record.
See http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/event.php?event_id=7751
The meeting is quorate.
Confirm minute taker
Tim Banks is taking the minutes.
Approve of minutes of Teleconference on 28th
November
See: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/15890
There were no comments and no objections to
approving the minutes.
Call For AOB
None.
Action Review
(Bryan/DaveS) Review
updated RMD. Carried fwd from 31st Oct. Done.
(DaveS) We need to go through the introduction to
check there is no reference to operations, and we left a hole for WSDM to deal
with operations.
(BryanM) Yes.
(DaveS) But apart from that it’s Done.
(Bryan) Move issue 164 to resolved.
Done
(Tim/Ian) Move Primer wd-10 to a Committee draft
on the Web site. Done
(Roger/Ian) Refresh AppNotes
and setup ballot to allow review/vote for new committee draft.
(IanR) Roger has
posted an update, I will set up a ballot.
Action: (Chairs) Set up a ballot for approval of AppNotes
Potential new
issues to consider - Bryan
(Bryan) There are none.
Issue
resolution
(BryanM) There are no open issues. Issue 164 (Nillable InitialTerminationTime
on SG Add) is resolved.
(DaveS) We need to execute on this.
Action: (Tim/Dave) Execute on/Review
issue 164 resolution.
(IanR) Can I add an agenda Item? – I want to know if we can go ahead and set up
a ballot for Committee specs.
(DaveS) Ok – we’ll do this next.
Update on
Committee Spec progress - Chairs
(DaveS) We were waiting for a stable namespace for
WS-Topics PR draft.
(IanR) The Notification TC have voted to adopt
PR2 drafts of Base-Notification (and Brokered Notification) They still do not have an adopted PR-1 draft
of WS-Topics, but we should push on and have our committee spec vote.
(DaveS) If there are people who haven’t voted on WSN
specs (meaning WS-Topics), can they do so now?
The ballot is open, but only 47% have voted – we need one more person!
[Lily votes…]
(IanR) This will be the set of specs that we took
through PR2, which have been updated (non-substantively) with all issues raised
in PR2.
(DaveS) We need to execute on 164. What other
actions do we need to perform first? What about the reference WS-Topics?
(IanR) We have the reference URL in our docs already, we just need the actual document from WSN.
(DaveS) WSN now has a majority for approval! I
second Ian’s motion to go forward to ballot.
(BryanM) From 154 on, the issues are resolved but
not closed. We need to check these out.
(DaveS) Do we need to set up a list of verifiers
for this list?
(IanR) I think we are done, but let’s check….
Spec by spec
(IanR) Resource Lifetime needed to fix up URLs in
section 8.1
(Latha) Those were Done.
(IanR) Yes- I have checked those.
(BryanM) These were Fujitsu comments on RL [issue
159]
(IanR) In RP, we needed to define the wsnt namespace in the namespaces section [issue 158].
(DaveS) So 158 and 159 can go to
closed and RL is done.
Action: (BryanM)
Move issues 158 and 159 to closed
(IanR) There were similar problems with
multi-line hyperlinks in PDFs.
(BryanM) That was 161 and 160.
(TimB) I altered SG.
(DaveS) So that fixes 161. Let’s ask Ian to check
the PDFs when they are generated.
Action: (IanR)
After the ballot, check that the multi-line PDFs are
Ok. (Items 161 & 160).
(IanR) We need to check the other way round. Is the first issue number 151? (Appnotes)
(BryanM) Yes
(IanR) Next is 154 (Appnotes)
155 is RMD, 156 is WS Resource which has been actioned,
but not reviewed.
(TimB) I have reviewed this.
Action: (BryanM)
Close issue 156.
(IanR) 157 is changing ##any to ##other has this
been done.
Action (Tim) Perform updates
for 157.
(IanR) 162 is about the Primer, 163 is RMD. That’s the lot.
Action (IanR)
Verify the changes.
(DaveS) So the proposal is to start a ballot on
the updated specs, schema and WSDLs. Any Objections?
None.
Action (Chairs) Create the ballot.
Face to Face
Meeting Discussion
Currently scheduled for Feb 13-15, which conflicts
with GGF16.
(DaveS) Do we need this meeting?
(IanR) I think we are doing what we need to via
the teleconferences, so we don’t need a face-to-face.
(DaveS) Any objections to that
strategy?
None.
Action: (DaveS)
Cancel the face-to-face via an explicit note.
(DaveS)- Should we do a F2F at the OASIS
Symposium? The meeting is in San Francisco, 10-12th
May.
(IanR) I think this is the same question - do we need
a face-to-face meeting?
(DaveS) We need to promote WSRF, but that’s for a
little further along. We should hold off until we need to meet. Any objections?
None.
AOB
(JemT) We need to
re-review the AppNotes. I will pass it back to Roger
before we vote on Committee draft.
(IanR) Ok. Please
arrange this with Roger, I will wait until Roger has
confirmed it is Ok.
Straggler Roll Call
Closed
17:41
Next telecon is 9th
Jan.
Summary of actions
(Chairs) Set up a ballot for approval of new AppNotes
(Tim/Dave) Execute on/Review issue 164 resolution.
(BryanM) Move issues 156, 158 and 159 to closed.
(Tim) Execute updates for issue 157.
(IanR) Verify the changes for issues 157 and 164.
(Chairs) After completion of 157 and 164 - Organise ballot for committee
specs.
(IanR) After the ballot, check that the
multi-line PDFs are Ok. (Issues151
& 160).
(DaveS) Cancel the face-to-face via an explicit
note to the mailing list.