[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrf] Public Comment on WS-RM v 1.0 (CA)
+1 for this. I suggest that the dialect URI == the RMD namespace (http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/rmd-1), which I think Kirk was implying. Dan kirk.wilson@ca.com wrote on 08/31/2006 12:56:57 PM: > With the emergence of both WS-MetadataExchange 1.1 and WS-RM, there will be > applications that need to integrate these two standards, e.g., by including > the RMD document in a WS-MEX document. > > One of the requirements of WS-MEX 1.1 is that the each type of metadata > document be identified (through a @Dialect attribute) by a URI. (The default > seems to be to use the URI of the metadata namespace.) So that applications > and integration efforts dont have to guess as to the dialect of the RMD > metadata document, CA suggests that there should be an explicit statement in > the WS-RM spec as to what the URI for the RMD document is for WS-MetaDataExchange. > > Kirk Wilson > CA, Inc.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]